首页> 外文OA文献 >Access Versus Incentives: Analysing Intellectual Property Policies in Four UN Specialized Agencies by Emphasizing the Role of the World Intellectual Property Organization and Human Rights
【2h】

Access Versus Incentives: Analysing Intellectual Property Policies in Four UN Specialized Agencies by Emphasizing the Role of the World Intellectual Property Organization and Human Rights

机译:获取与激励:通过强调世界知识产权组织和人权的作用来分析四个联合国专门机构的知识产权政策

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Concerns have been expressed over the role of WIPO in influencing the intellectual property policies of other specialized agencies of the United Nations. This article reviews the policies of FAO, WHO and UNESCO, in addition to WIPO itself, and finds very interesting patterns of cooperation. While intellectual property law is primarily concerned with providing incentives for the production of new, creative and applicable arts and knowledge, human rights law is primarily concerned with providing improved access to goods crucial for human well-being and survival. WIPO itself has expressed in some of its documents concerns of the issue of access, and has shown some understanding of human rights concerns in this regard. While UNESCO has paid less attention to intellectual property rights over the last decades, rather emphasizing cultural preservation, both FAO and WHO has increased their focus on intellectual property rights. The two latter increase their cooperation with WIPO, but without a formal agreement with WIPO. The article finds that WIPO, as a specialized agency, has to cooperate with specialized agencies, and there is no reason to believe that the cooperation will be in the form of a ‘one-way’ process in which WIPO instructs the other agencies. At the same time, if the emphasis on incentives in effect undermines the real access to the crucial goods, a new balance has to be found.
机译:人们对WIPO在影响联合国其他专门机构的知识产权政策中的作用表示关切。除了WIPO本身之外,本文还回顾了粮农组织,世界卫生组织和教科文组织的政策,并发现了非常有趣的合作模式。知识产权法主要与提供激励措施有关的新的,创造性的和适用的艺术和知识的生产,而人权法主要与提供改善对人类福祉和生存至关重要的商品的获取有关。 WIPO本身在一些文件中表达了对获取问题的关注,并对这方面的人权关注表达了一些理解。在过去的几十年中,尽管教科文组织对知识产权的关注减少了,而只强调文化保护,但粮农组织和世卫组织都更加重视知识产权。后者两者增加了与WIPO的合作,但未与WIPO达成正式协议。该文章认为,WIPO作为专门机构,必须与专门机构合作,没有理由相信合作将以“单向”程序的形式进行,其中WIPO会指示其他机构。同时,如果实际上对奖励措施的强调破坏了对关键商品的实际获取,则必须找到新的平衡。

著录项

  • 作者

    Haugen, Hans Morten;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号